RO water purification

by dhunsber @, ¡Dondequiera que voy, estoy aquí!, Wednesday, November 29, 2017, 08:46 (15 days ago) @ midalake

Wrong, and you seem not to be alone in that mistake.
Here is the first sentence of Talley Ho's reply to Gringo Viejo's query about Reverse Osmosis (RO) water treatment:
"We seriously looked into it, but for every gallon, three are wasted. That blew that."
That sentence referred to RO, not UV, which had been mentioned in the reply just before Talley Ho's. They were replying to Gringo Viejo's original query, not the first reply. Please pay better attention to how this message board clearly shows which replies are to the original post and which are to other replies.

Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread