as we are approaching one month since the fire, what is the word on whether people are being allowed to rebuild on the site or is a relocation elsewhere in the works?

I may be ignorant of some of the details, but generally it looks like it's going to be the politically popular thing to allow most of the squatters to continue occupying what is supposed to be our ecological zone. The city put in a new Acapulco-style road, taking some of the land that was formerly occupied. And as predicted some foreigners allowed themselves to be played by politicians, photos in the papers and all that jazz, much to the consternation of law-abiding citizens who can't help but wonder why foreigners would do such a thing and seemingly reward lawbreakers. It's one thing to help victims, another to help thieves. But like I said, I could be missing something. Probably my marbles.